homepage
rss
site map
about
events
links
choose language
Intercultural
Lexicon

Other

The process resulting in the definition of one’s own identity – hence an “us” – in an oppositional manner by, explicitly or implicitly comparing ourselves with “others”, is considered a universal movement in every society.

Read more

Cultural Pluralism, The Challenge of our Time

“Cultural pluralism” is a recent concept in Europe to the extent that many do not know what it means.

Read more

Modernity

The concept of modernity can be analysed from various points of view. A sociological perspective sees modernity as the historical era arising from feudal society’s profound transformation processes and that, starting with the Protestant Reformation, sees the emergence of the new bourgeoisie..

Read more

Tolerance

After the Nineties of the 20th Century tolerance returned to the centre stage in political thought, returning to fashion a concept that has certainly been central within the framework of political thought in modern times, but that appeared to have become a closed book with the French Revolution that...

Read more

Secularisation and Post-Secularisation

“Secularisation” means the process that has above all characterised western countries during the contemporary era and led to the progressive abandonment of religious rules and sacral kinds of behaviour..

Read more
Reset
A month of ideas.
Giancarlo Bosetti Editor-in-chief
Association for dialogue and intercultural understanding
Intercultural Lexicon
IT AR Tuesday, 7 November 2006

Multiculturalism

Elisabetta Galeotti

The word began to be used at the end of the Eighties in the United States to indicate an ideal society in which various cultures could co-exist with reciprocal respect, but avoiding all domination and assimilation into the dominant culture.


Multiculturalism is basically an aspiration of the representatives and spokespersons of the various minority groups, to state the legitimacy of their own differences and obtain the acknowledgement of their cultural characteristics. What this acceptance of differences and this cultural acknowledgement actually consists in is a controversial issue that allows for both weak and strong interpretations, ranging from the public tolerance of cultural differences, to requests for support for the survival of a culture of origin.

Multiculturalism therefore presents itself as an alternative to the traditional melting pot, the ideal American assimilation, also summarised in the saying e plurimus unus, where the accent is placed on the unification and integration of all the groups in one single nation. The reasons for this passage from the melting pot to multiculturalism are seen as the failed and incomplete integration resulting from that model: unification in fact meant assimilation into the dominant group, on one hand, and a persistent discrimination and alienation of minorities on the other. Cultural domination and social inequality appeared as a non contingent result of the traditional integration’s ideals and policies, to which disadvantaged minorities, mainly Afro-American, opposed an attitude asserting their own differences and celebrating their own cultural origins.

Towards the end of the Eighties many different claims were presented in the name of multiculturalism. In the United States this began with battles concerning educational programmes, and in particular against the “norm”, hence the ensemble of literature’s classics and those of western schools of thought, traditionally studied in schools. Requests included a broadening of the programme so as to also make time for the artistic and literary expressions of other cultures. An intense controversy arose on this subject that saw opposed on one hand the supporters of differences and multiculturalism, and on the other the defenders of tradition, who counterattacked with a controversy on “political correctness”. The democratic liberals were divided here and there, some accepting the request for fair integration, and others opposing the particularistic and relativist aspects of the celebration of differences.

After this tempestuous debut, multiculturalism emerged from the battle on the curricula and from the United States. It found famous supporters in liberal thinkers such as Will Kymlicka, Joseph Raz, and Avishai Margalit, addressing various requests ranging from tolerance for dress-codes to bilingual schools, changes in school meals and requests for cultural rights. Towards the end of the Nineties it seemed, at least at far as the legitimacy of a public debate was concerned, that multiculturalism had won the battle. Not for long. Criticism of multiculturalism then started in the name of women’s rights. In 1998 Susan Okin wrote a famous essay entitled: “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” in which she denounced the fact that the protection of non-Western culture implied neglecting women’s rights in those patriarchal and oppressive cultures.

At a philosophical level, some, like Brian Barry (2000), stated that one cannot remedy discrimination and inequality with other discriminations of the opposite kind and that the only remedy is liberal equality. To this one must add the atmosphere of suspicion surrounding Arabs and Muslims after September 11th 2001, increased by other terrorist attacks, and explains multiculturalism’s rapid loss of credibility as well as that of the policies it inspired. This had the bizarre effect due to which in our country criticism of multiculturalism began before the phenomenon has been really understood, studied and adopted as a guideline for cultural policies.

To the question asking whether multiculturalism inevitably leads to a mosaic-like society, tribe-like in its various traditions, to abandoning women’s rights and those of individualism within cultures, and to a perspective of cultural relativism leaving us helpless facing attacks from Muslim fundamentalism, the answer is no, unless one provides a caricatured and biased version of multiculturalism. If multiculturalism is supported by the universal principals of the liberal tradition (equal respect, non discrimination, tolerance, equal opportunities), as happens in the best interpretations, and if achieved with an open mind, with attempts and errors, trying to accommodate all, for the moment there is no other ideal present to replace it for the coexistence of various groups and cultures.
 

Newsletter

Sign up to receive our newsletter


Questo sito utilizza i cookies per offrirti una migliore esperienza di navigazione, in particolare vengono utilizzati cookies tecnici per consentire la normale navigazione e fruizione del sito stesso e dei suoi servizi; cookies di terze parti per raccogliere informazioni, in forma aggregata, sul numero degli utenti del nostro sito e su come questi visitano lo stesso e cookie di profilazione al fine di inviare messaggi pubblicitari in linea con le preferenze manifestate dall'utente nell'ambito della navigazione in rete.

Se vuoi saperne di più o negare il consenso a tutti o solo ad alcuni cookies clicca qui.
Se nascondi questo banner o accedi a un qualunque elemento della pagina acconsenti all'uso dei cookies.